Services
// Managed FinOps
Cost optimization that doesn’t quit after month one
A one-time cost audit is a diet; costs creep back the moment attention moves on. Managed FinOps is the habit: our team watches your spend every month, catches waste as it appears, applies optimizations, and reports savings in numbers your CFO can check.
// The problem
Why one-time savings don’t stay saved.
-
The cleanup decayed
Last year’s optimization sprint saved real money. A quarter later the number crept back — new projects, new instances, nobody watching.
-
The anomaly arrived with the invoice
A misconfigured job burned budget for three weeks before anyone saw it, because the first alarm was the bill itself.
-
Forecast and actual live in different files
Finance forecasts annually; engineering deploys weekly. The two numbers meet for the first time at quarter end, in an unpleasant meeting.
-
Nobody owns the number month to month
Everyone owns cost in principle. In practice, ownership is a calendar slot with a name on it — and nobody’s calendar has one.
// What’s included
The habit, not the diet.
-
Continuous spend monitoring and anomaly alerts
Daily monitoring with alerts on unusual movement — waste caught as it appears, not at quarter end when it has already compounded.
-
Monthly optimization actions
Rightsizing, commitment top-ups, cleanup of what nobody uses — proposed with the maths shown, applied after your approval, itemised in the report.
-
Budget governance and forecast tracking
Budgets per team with alerts before they burst, and a forecast that is reconciled against actuals every month, so the number stops surprising anyone.
-
Monthly savings report
Three columns your CFO can check: actioned, saved, and recommended next. If a month has nothing worth doing, the report says that too.
-
Quarterly FinOps review
Finance and engineering leads in the same room, once a quarter — commitments re-sized, the coming quarter’s changes priced before they land.
// How it runs
A monthly rhythm, not a project.
| Cadence | What happens |
|---|---|
| Daily | Spend monitored, anomalies alerted to a named owner — ours. |
| Monthly | Optimization actions proposed and applied with your approval, and the savings report lands in your inbox. |
| Quarterly | A review with your finance and engineering leads: commitments, forecasts and the roadmap’s cost implications. |
Start with the one-time audit, or begin here directly. Pricing is scoped to your estate — talk to us and we will quote it in writing.
// Which one you want
The audit, or the subscription?
| What is being compared | Cloud Cost Management (audit) | Managed FinOps (this page) |
|---|---|---|
| Shape | One-time audit and optimization | Monthly subscription |
| Best when | You need the answer now | You want the number owned, always |
| You walk away with | Itemised savings and a plan | A practice that does not decay |
| Typical path | Start there | keep it here |
// Proof
We run our own spend on this rhythm.
ShopSCAPE and Pantip MALL run on the clouds we optimize. The monitoring, the monthly actions and the savings report on this page are the practice we apply to our own bill — our margin depends on it holding.
// Common questions
What finance and engineering ask.
How is this different from the one-time cost audit?
The audit answers “where is the money going and what can we fix” — once. Managed FinOps is the standing practice that keeps the answer true: monitoring, monthly actions and a report, every month. Most teams do the audit first and continue here.
Who approves changes to our environment?
You do. Every action is proposed with its saving and its risk class; safe cleanup can be pre-approved, anything touching a workload waits for your sign-off. The subscription buys attention and analysis, not unsupervised hands.
What is in the monthly report?
Three columns: what we actioned, what it saved, and what we recommend next — in numbers finance can reconcile against the invoice. When a month has nothing worth doing, the report says so rather than inventing activity.
Does it pay for itself?
Most months it should, especially in the first year when the backlog of rightsizing and commitments is deepest. When it stops paying for itself, you will see that in the same report — and scaling the subscription down is a conversation we will start, not one you will have to.
Do we have to buy our cloud through you?
No. The practice works on any billing account. When billing runs through us, action is faster — commitments and account structure change without a third party in the loop.
Put the bill under supervision
Most months the subscription should pay for itself — and when it doesn’t, you will know exactly why.
Innovate for the better tomorrow.
// Corporate update
Our
Move
-
Buying the platform and building on it used to be two conversations with two suppliers. It is one conversation now: we resell Google Cloud, Alibaba Cloud and BytePlus, and the same engineers who size the environment stay with it through production support.
For teams already running with us, nothing changes technically — the difference is commercial. Licensing, quota and billing sit with the people who know what the workload actually does.
-
A certified implementation partner works to the cloud provider's published reference architectures. In practice that means your landing zone, IAM model and network layout look like something any Google Cloud engineer can pick up — including the next team you hire.
It also means the review gates are not ours to waive. Where the reference architecture asks for separation of duties or a break-glass path, it gets built.
-
Hospital data arrives in fragments — HIS exports, lab feeds, scanned forms, free-text notes in Thai and English. Before a model sees any of it, someone has to answer where each field came from, who consented to what, and which records must never leave the country.
We build that layer first. It is slower to demo and it is the reason the pilots survive contact with a real ward.
-
Live commerce moves fast enough that the recommendation loop has to close in the same session. That puts the weight on the event pipeline, not the model: what counts as a view, when a cart event lands, how quickly the feature store sees it.
We treat the BytePlus components as a stack to be wired properly rather than a switch to be flipped. The lift comes from the wiring.
-
The site you are reading ships as static HTML, one stylesheet and one script, served by a Node process with a strict content security policy. There is no analytics tag, no font CDN and no tracker.
It is partly a statement of taste and partly a working sample: the same restraint we bring to a client's platform, applied to our own front door.
-
Warehouses fill up faster than they get governed. By the time a model needs a feature, nobody can say which of the four revenue columns is authoritative, and the project stalls in a meeting about definitions.
The fix is unglamorous: contracts on the ingest side, lineage through the transformations, and one owner per domain. Do that and the AI work stops being archaeology.